Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Patterson
This post compares San Fernando, California to Patterson, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Patterson (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 21,497 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $43,090 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $258,600 |
| White | 57% | 72% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 30 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Patterson?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than Patterson: 24581 compared with 21497 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Patterson?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Patterson?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 38% for Patterson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z