Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Oakland
This post compares San Fernando, California to Oakland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Oakland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 417,442 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $52,981 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $564,500 |
| White | 57% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 24% |
| Asian | 1% | 15% |
| With Kids | 49% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Oakland?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Oakland: 24581 compared with 417442 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Oakland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Oakland?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 60% for Oakland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z