Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to National City
This post compares San Fernando, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $345,400 |
| White | 57% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 1% | 19% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or National City?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than National City: 24581 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or National City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z