Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Long Beach
This post compares San Fernando, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $476,400 |
| White | 57% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 12% |
| Asian | 1% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Long Beach?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 24581 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z