Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Livermore
This post compares San Fernando, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $643,200 |
| White | 57% | 78% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 10% |
| With Kids | 49% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Livermore?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Livermore: 24581 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z