Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Lancaster
This post compares San Fernando, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $213,100 |
| White | 57% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 21% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Lancaster?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 24581 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Fernando versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z