Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Imperial Beach
This post compares San Fernando, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $433,400 |
| White | 57% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 1% | 8% |
| With Kids | 49% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 31 |
| Rentals | 45% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Imperial Beach?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than Imperial Beach: 24581 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z