Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Foster City
This post compares San Fernando, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 57% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 47% |
| With Kids | 49% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Foster City?
A: San Fernando has a smaller population count than Foster City: 24581 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Fernando versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z