Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Dana Point
This post compares San Fernando, California to Dana Point, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Dana Point (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 34,028 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $70,677 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $833,800 |
| White | 57% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 3% |
| With Kids | 49% | 22% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 48 |
| Rentals | 45% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Dana Point?
A: San Fernando has a smaller population count than Dana Point: 24581 compared with 34028 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Dana Point?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Dana Point?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 39% for Dana Point.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z