Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Culver City
This post compares San Fernando, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Culver City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,581 | 39,432 |
Income (median) | $37,371 | $65,816 |
Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $735,600 |
White | 57% | 62% |
Black | 1% | 7% |
Asian | 1% | 15% |
With Kids | 49% | 27% |
Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
Rentals | 45% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Culver City?
A: San Fernando has a smaller population count than Culver City: 24581 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Fernando versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z