Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Burbank
This post compares San Fernando, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $574,300 |
| White | 57% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 11% |
| With Kids | 49% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Burbank?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 24581 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z