Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Beverly Hills
This post compares San Fernando, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 57% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 9% |
| With Kids | 49% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 43 |
| Rentals | 45% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Beverly Hills?
A: San Fernando has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 24581 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z