Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Ashland
This post compares San Fernando, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $396,400 |
| White | 57% | 44% |
| Black | 1% | 17% |
| Asian | 1% | 20% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Ashland?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than Ashland: 24581 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z