Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Dimas to South San Jose Hills
This post compares San Dimas, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Dimas (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,334 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $61,413 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $513,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 67% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 10% |
| With Kids | 31% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 28% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Dimas or South San Jose Hills?
A: San Dimas has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 34334 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Dimas or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Dimas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Dimas or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Dimas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Jose Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 28% for San Dimas versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Dimas may include: Glendora, Laguna-Hills, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z