Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Dimas to South San Francisco
This post compares San Dimas, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Dimas (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,334 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $61,413 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $513,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 67% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 39% |
| With Kids | 31% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 28% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Dimas or South San Francisco?
A: San Dimas has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 34334 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Dimas or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Dimas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Dimas or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Dimas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for San Dimas versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Dimas may include: Glendora, Laguna-Hills, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z