Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Dimas to South Pasadena
This post compares San Dimas, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Dimas (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,334 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $61,413 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $513,300 | $928,500 |
White | 67% | 54% |
Black | 2% | 3% |
Asian | 16% | 29% |
With Kids | 31% | 34% |
Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
Rentals | 28% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Dimas or South Pasadena?
A: San Dimas has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 34334 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Dimas or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Dimas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Dimas or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Dimas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for San Dimas versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Dimas may include: Glendora, Laguna-Hills, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z