Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Diego to South San Jose Hills
This post compares San Diego, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Diego (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,390,966 | 20,423 |
Income (median) | $51,979 | $31,494 |
Home Value (median) | $523,600 | $322,800 |
White | 64% | 36% |
Black | 6% | 1% |
Asian | 16% | 10% |
With Kids | 30% | 54% |
Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
Rentals | 53% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Diego or South San Jose Hills?
A: San Diego has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 1390966 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Diego or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Diego.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Diego or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Diego.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Diego does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for San Diego versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Diego may include: San-Jose, San-Francisco, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z