Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Diego to South Pasadena
This post compares San Diego, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Diego (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,390,966 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $51,979 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $523,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 64% | 54% |
| Black | 6% | 3% |
| Asian | 16% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 53% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Diego or South Pasadena?
A: San Diego has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 1390966 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Diego or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Diego.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Diego or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Diego.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for San Diego versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Diego may include: San-Jose, San-Francisco, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z