Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Upland
This post compares San Bruno, California to Upland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Upland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 76,155 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $50,675 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $465,200 |
| White | 49% | 63% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 28% | 8% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Upland?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Upland: 43105 compared with 76155 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Upland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Upland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Upland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 44% for Upland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z