Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Union City
This post compares San Bruno, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $620,200 |
| White | 49% | 21% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 28% | 53% |
| With Kids | 30% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Union City?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Union City: 43105 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z