Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to South San Francisco
This post compares San Bruno, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 49% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or South San Francisco?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 43105 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z