Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to South El Monte
This post compares San Bruno, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $389,400 |
| White | 49% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 28% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or South El Monte?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than South El Monte: 43105 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z