Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Saratoga
This post compares San Bruno, California to Saratoga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Saratoga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 31,013 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $145,368 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $1,933,900 |
| White | 49% | 48% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 28% | 46% |
| With Kids | 30% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 49 |
| Rentals | 44% | 15% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Saratoga?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Saratoga: 43105 compared with 31013 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Saratoga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Saratoga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 15% for Saratoga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z