Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Santa Paula
This post compares San Bruno, California to Santa Paula, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Santa Paula (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 30,344 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $36,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $349,500 |
| White | 49% | 85% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 28% | 1% |
| With Kids | 30% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Santa Paula?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Santa Paula: 43105 compared with 30344 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Santa Paula?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Santa Paula?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 45% for Santa Paula.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z