Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to San Francisco
This post compares San Bruno, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Bruno (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,105 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $61,645 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $927,400 |
White | 49% | 47% |
Black | 1% | 5% |
Asian | 28% | 34% |
With Kids | 30% | 18% |
Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
Rentals | 44% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or San Francisco?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 43105 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z