Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to San Dimas
This post compares San Bruno, California to San Dimas, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | San Dimas (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 34,334 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $61,413 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $513,300 |
| White | 49% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 44% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or San Dimas?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than San Dimas: 43105 compared with 34334 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in San Dimas?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or San Dimas?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 28% for San Dimas.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z