Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Rowland Heights
This post compares San Bruno, California to Rowland Heights, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Rowland Heights (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 50,572 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $42,165 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $594,400 |
| White | 49% | 24% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 28% | 61% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 44% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Rowland Heights?
A: San Bruno has a similar population count than Rowland Heights: 43105 compared with 50572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Rowland Heights?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Rowland Heights?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 34% for Rowland Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z