Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Ridgecrest
This post compares San Bruno, California to Ridgecrest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Ridgecrest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 28,728 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $53,642 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $169,500 |
| White | 49% | 74% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 28% | 6% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 44% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Ridgecrest?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Ridgecrest: 43105 compared with 28728 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Ridgecrest?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Ridgecrest?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 37% for Ridgecrest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z