Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Redwood City
This post compares San Bruno, California to Redwood City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Redwood City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 84,368 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $70,131 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $1,016,700 |
| White | 49% | 60% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 44% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Redwood City?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Redwood City: 43105 compared with 84368 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Redwood City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Redwood City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 49% for Redwood City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z