Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Pomona
This post compares San Bruno, California to Pomona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Pomona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 152,366 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $35,431 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $344,200 |
| White | 49% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 6% |
| Asian | 28% | 9% |
| With Kids | 30% | 44% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 44% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Pomona?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Pomona: 43105 compared with 152366 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Pomona?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Pomona?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pomona does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 47% for Pomona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z