Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Pleasant Hill
This post compares San Bruno, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $633,400 |
| White | 49% | 75% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 28% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Pleasant Hill?
A: San Bruno has a similar population count than Pleasant Hill: 43105 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z