Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Pico Rivera
This post compares San Bruno, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $380,200 |
| White | 49% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 28% | 3% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 44% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Pico Rivera?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 43105 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z