Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Pasadena
This post compares San Bruno, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $689,700 |
| White | 49% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 10% |
| Asian | 28% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 44% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Pasadena?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 43105 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z