Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to National City
This post compares San Bruno, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $345,400 |
| White | 49% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 28% | 19% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or National City?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than National City: 43105 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or National City?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z