Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Long Beach
This post compares San Bruno, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $476,400 |
| White | 49% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 12% |
| Asian | 28% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Long Beach?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 43105 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z