Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Lake Forest
This post compares San Bruno, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,105 | 81,812 |
Income (median) | $61,645 | $64,458 |
Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $585,100 |
White | 49% | 67% |
Black | 1% | 2% |
Asian | 28% | 15% |
With Kids | 30% | 34% |
Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
Rentals | 44% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Lake Forest?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Lake Forest: 43105 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z