Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Laguna Hills
This post compares San Bruno, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $649,700 |
| White | 49% | 69% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 44% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Laguna Hills?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 43105 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z