Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to La Mesa
This post compares San Bruno, California to La Mesa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | La Mesa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 59,479 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $50,460 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $455,800 |
| White | 49% | 72% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 28% | 5% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 44% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or La Mesa?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than La Mesa: 43105 compared with 59479 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in La Mesa?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or La Mesa?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: La Mesa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 58% for La Mesa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z