Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Irvine
This post compares San Bruno, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $753,400 |
| White | 49% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 28% | 41% |
| With Kids | 30% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Irvine?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 43105 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z