Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Imperial Beach
This post compares San Bruno, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $433,400 |
| White | 49% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 28% | 8% |
| With Kids | 30% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 44% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Imperial Beach?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Imperial Beach: 43105 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z