Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Foster City
This post compares San Bruno, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 49% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 47% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 44% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Foster City?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Foster City: 43105 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z