Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Foothill Farms
This post compares San Bruno, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $201,200 |
| White | 49% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 28% | 5% |
| With Kids | 30% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
| Rentals | 44% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Foothill Farms?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 43105 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z