Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Elk Grove
This post compares San Bruno, California to Elk Grove, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Elk Grove (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 166,228 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $60,199 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $349,500 |
| White | 49% | 45% |
| Black | 1% | 11% |
| Asian | 28% | 28% |
| With Kids | 30% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 44% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Elk Grove?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Elk Grove: 43105 compared with 166228 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Elk Grove?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Elk Grove?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 27% for Elk Grove.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z