Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Culver City
This post compares San Bruno, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $735,600 |
| White | 49% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 28% | 15% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 44% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Culver City?
A: San Bruno has a similar population count than Culver City: 43105 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z