Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Corona
This post compares San Bruno, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $411,600 |
| White | 49% | 66% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 28% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Corona?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Corona: 43105 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z