Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Concord
This post compares San Bruno, California to Concord, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Concord (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 128,160 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $56,608 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $461,700 |
| White | 49% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 28% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Concord?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Concord: 43105 compared with 128160 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Concord?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Concord?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 40% for Concord.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z