Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Cathedral City
This post compares San Bruno, California to Cathedral City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Cathedral City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 53,733 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $33,790 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $232,400 |
| White | 49% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 28% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 44% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Cathedral City?
A: San Bruno has a similar population count than Cathedral City: 43105 compared with 53733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Cathedral City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Cathedral City?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 39% for Cathedral City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z