Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Carmichael
This post compares San Bruno, California to Carmichael, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Carmichael (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 65,091 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $50,938 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $334,900 |
| White | 49% | 80% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 28% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 42 |
| Rentals | 44% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Carmichael?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Carmichael: 43105 compared with 65091 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Carmichael?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Carmichael?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Carmichael does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for San Bruno versus 45% for Carmichael.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z