Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Burlingame
This post compares San Bruno, California to Burlingame, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Burlingame (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 30,401 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $93,145 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $1,591,600 |
| White | 49% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 28% | 24% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 44% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Burlingame?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Burlingame: 43105 compared with 30401 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Burlingame?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Burlingame?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 52% for Burlingame.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z