Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Burbank
This post compares San Bruno, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $574,300 |
| White | 49% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Burbank?
A: San Bruno has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 43105 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z